Author: Paul

Does the truth really matter any more? Comey playbook, baby. It’s like Bill Barr graduated from cover letters to writing report highlights. Two-fer this week, with more than one Supreme Court Justice recently making the absurdly false assertion that one state decides a Presidential election. It belies their political motivation in the most obscene way, openly flaunting both the rule of law and common sense, not to mention core American values.

“For other recovered classified documents, after a thorough investigation the decision to decline criminal charges was straightforward. The FBI recovered additional marked classified documents at the Penn Biden Center, elsewhere in Mr. Biden’s Delaware home, and in collections of his Senate papers at the University of Delaware, but the evidence suggests that Mr. Biden did not willfully retain these documents and that they could plausibly have been brought to these locations by mistake. We also investigated whether persons other than Mr. Biden knowingly mishandled these classified documents, and our investigation showed that they did not. In reaching these conclusions, we note the numerous previous instances in which marked classified documents have been discovered intermixed with the personal papers of former Executive Branch officials and members of Congress.” (p. 12)

Most understand the simple fact lawyering and wordplay go hand-in-hand. It is after all, their whole stock in trade. Fundamentally, “Law” is certain groups of people enshrining their notion of conceptualized human behavior in consensus form, written down in WORDS for all to follow and enforce. They don’t even write it down in some of the more primitive locations. The past six years have demonstrated to my satisfaction, how those words really mean only what the people in power want them to. What appears to me as the biggest legal challenge of my generation amounts to the most powerful judges in the world looking for an off-ramp re-defining words due to their arrangement and even lack thereof.

Among them are at least three with no right to be there. We have the philandering nigger (black American-type, in this case), working tirelessly to line his greedy pockets with his conservative master’s bribes while his wife pushed QANON conspiracies supporting the sedition. Garland should have been there, but for McConnel’s deceitful legislative skulduggery installing at least a couple more. Totally unqualified baby-maker – great for the Catholics, right? Kavanaugh? Seriously?

So yeah, maybe there’s some ambiguity there in that ol’ section 3. I get it. And they’re absolutely right, for all the wrong reasons. Who gives a shit about accountability, when there’s elections to run? Some state(s) might assume power not specifically spelled out for the Feds? What if you mutherfuckers just stop playing what-if, kicking the can down the road and make a call on the actual question at hand here? At least it would be better regulated anarchy. It’ll take awhile longer to vote him out again, but hopefully Napoleon Bonespurs will feel it better that way. With a little luck, it really will be the end of the GOP. Alot more people will get hurt and killed, but dammit, we have law to interpret!

All the Congressional fuckwits needed to do was follow the law and convict the cocksucker when they had the chance(s). Done well, most of this would have lawfully never happened. Now they live in mortal fear of the popularity contest they’ve supplanted governing with. Holding power tap dancing around obvious corruption and crimes against this country with wordy legalese in grandiose Senate hearings was more important than it’s safety and security. Now we have this imminently existential interpretation requirement for centuries-old law delineating self-evident crimes.

I don’t like where the connection to this dot is going. I have an extremely dim view of the politicians plotting it’s course in the mistaken belief they can skirt the law with wordplay, especially those wearing robes to work. We remember where the pitchforks are. Every one of you shit-for-brains politicians and self-important judges should sleep well knowing the blood of thousands of Russians, Ukranians, Palestinians and Israelis, not to mention tangential impacts the world over, is on your incompetent hands.

Courtesy the Lincoln Project.

I wonder if this gang of fuckwits is the first governing body collectively plotting not to do things they are ostensibly actually in the process of attempting to do? The Mayorkis distraction differs from Donnie Dipshyt‘s hold on the Twitter® faction only in the insanity’s scale and intensity.

So now we have some Christo-Fascist nutjob calling shots on legislation he hasn’t even seen – legislation that by all accounts from any non-Trumpist with anything to say or do about it including the Border Patrol themselves – would like to see enacted. His predecessor, along with him and anyone who doesn’t give them what they want are literally pre-planned government failures. These cocksuckers are acting in their government roles as if the former POTUS has already begun his reign of dicatorial terror.

Not hard to call, just looking at him. Certainly appears to be a subservient-type fuckwit.

This nitwit from the great state of Ohio went on ABC This Week today to be repeatedly corrected, fact-checked and basically humiliated with obvious questions about his lies and politics. Unsurprisingly, his message tap-danced around The Mango Menace‘ court issues and their implications for elections the Fuckwit is not even eligible to run in.

He appeared fairly agitated, for good reason. These shit-for-brains nazis know their political fates are now inexorably tied to the biggest Albatross ever descending into Repuglican Hell.

In a contentious interview with ABC News “This Week” anchor George Stephanopoulos, Vance — a onetime Trump critic – also doubled down on his views of the 2020 election, saying the results shouldn’t have been immediately certified, and he went on to suggest Trump should ignore “illegitimate” U.S. Supreme Court rulings.