Pam Bondi did a great job embarrassing herself, responding to what seemed to me to be an incomprehensible question: “What did Hunter Biden do for Burisma?” More to the point IMHO, who cares? The pause determining who would even answer the call was telling. Later pauses looking up basic facts obviously irrelevant to anything in question was even more telling. The defense team does not appear to be up to speed on the trivial details of their own case. I was given to believe the whole false Biden/Burisma narrative was central to the defense?
Distracted by your own pernicious distraction. Almost as bad as Philbin responding to being called out on the subpoena authorization line of bullshyt. Ignore the real fact, repeat the alternate fact. Derschowitz is a master of circular reasoning, railing against the framer’s vague generality stance while denying any potentially as yet unknowable acts by this or any future President should be considered impeachable – based on precedent(?). Well, they never did that before – must be OK!
The left sends compelling oratory with Demings, Jeffries and Schiff. The right stumbles to define any semblance of a coherent case. Their evasive responses grow tiring. Utterly disgraceful.